The energy value of Lupinus angustifolius and Lupinus albus for growing pigs

Ninety male crossbred pigs were allocated at 30 kg live weight to a 6 5 factorial experiment involving six diets and five levels of feeding where average daily intakes were 1.11, 1.36, 1.67, 1.90 kg and ad libitum between 30 and 60 kg live weight. The control diet contained predominantly animal protein sources, another four diets contained 350 g/kg of either kernels or seeds of either L. angustifolius cv. Gungurru or L. albus cv. Kiev while the remaining diet contained 350 g/kg of peas. All diets were formulated to contain 15.3 MJ DE/kg and 0.7 g available lysine/MJ DE to ensure that dietary protein was adequate. Six estimates of the digestibility of each protein source were determined by the total faecal collection method. The digestible energy contents ( SE) of L. angustifolius seed and kernel, L. albus seed and kernel and peas were 15.81 (0.18), 16.85 (0.76), 16.84 (0.34), 17.70 (0.47) and 14.98 (0.15) MJ/kg air dry, respectively. All pigs were killed at 60 kg live weight and the dressing percentage of pigs given L. angustifolius and L. albus diets were 2.6 and 4.7 units lower than the mean dressing percentage of pigs given the other diets. The major factors contributing to this reduction in dressing percentage when lupins were offered to pigs were gut fill and differences in intestinal weight. The relative energy value of the protein sources was assessed by comparing the relationship between the rates of energy deposition in the empty body and DE intake for the diets. The response of energy deposition to energy intake was similar for kernel and seed for both L. angustifolius and L. albus and thus data for kernel and seed were consolidated for both types of lupins. The respective linear relationships between energy deposited in the empty body (E, MJ/day) Animal Feed Science and Technology 83 (2000) 17±30 * Corresponding author. Tel.: ‡61-3-9742-0441; fax: ‡61-3-9742-0400. E-mail address: [email protected] (R.H. King). 0377-8401/00/$ ± see front matter # 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII: S 0 3 7 7 8 4 0 1 ( 9 9 ) 0 0 1 1 5 7 and DE intake (DE, MJ/day) for the diets, with appropriate SE of the coefficients in parenthesis, were: Animal protein diet: E ˆ 0.630 (0.043) DE ÿ 4.95 (0.99) R ˆ 0.947 p < 0.001 L. angustifolius diet: E ˆ 0.485 (0.035) DE ÿ 4.88 (0.86) R ˆ 0.872 p < 0.001 L. albus diet E ˆ 0.403 (0.033) DE ÿ 4.35 (0.78) R ˆ 0.862 p < 0.001 Pea diet: E ˆ 0.582 (0.083) DE ÿ 5.01 (1.96) R ˆ 0.816 p < 0.001. The net energy content of the protein sources were calculated to be 5.6, 6.5, 3.0, 4.6 and 8.3 MJ/ kg for L. angustifolius seed, L. angustifolius kernel, L. albus seed, L. albus kernel and peas, respectively. # 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.